Monday, March 23, 2009
The Case for Regionalism As previewed in the March 18 post below, State Rep. Brendan Sharkey was a guest at this evening’s East Rock
Community Management Team meeting. Before hearing from Rep. Sharkey, the team received information tonight
from engineering director Tom Sgroi of the Greater New Haven Water Pollution Control Authority (created in 2005 to serve New Haven, East Haven, Hamden, and Woodbridge) about a repair project near East Rock Park. After this glimpse at a specific case of a regional venture, Brendan Sharkey – who
represents Hamden and co-chairs the General Assembly’s Planning and Development Committee – discussed the Smart
Growth Working Group and legislative proposals for broader regional cooperation in Connecticut. One incentive:
federal dollars – on which Connecticut has been missing out – that may be available for regions that work more
systematically to submit and implement qualifying Comprehensive Economic Development Strategies (CEDS), which our state surely
needs. He mentioned the South Central Regional Council of Governments, one of 15 such regions in Connecticut – probably two or three times as many as we need in our small state.
Building upon this existing structure or a modified version of it, the proposed legislation would foster more extensive
planning and – through one bill – funnel one penny of the 6 percent sales tax back to the region of origin.
Rep. Sharkey acknowledged the
immediate political obstacles to this measure, since the fiscally challenged state government can currently ill afford to
yield one-sixth of its sales tax revenues to the regions. However, over time this could become more palatable,
especially as economies from greater regionalism emerge. Savings might come from areas including public
health, public safety/emergency preparedness, engineering/public works, and special education. Key aims
include not only preservation of open space but also redevelopment of old industrial brownfields, better and cleaner transportation
options – with expanded parking around train stations needed – and reasonably priced housing located near those
transit points. (He cited 360 State Street, with its proximity to trains, as a smart-growth example.)
A reduced reliance on the property tax is one
goal. Level funding of payments-in-lieu-of-taxes (PILOT), for tax-exempt nonprofit or state-owned properties,
is assumed. For hubs such as New Haven that will continue to host many regional services, this is a clear
concern. In response to a question, Rep. Sharkey
reported that the Planning and Development Committee has approved the bill to allow municipalities to delay by a year phase-in
of property revaluation. For New Haven, that will mean a one-year reprieve in the continuing shift of the
tax allocation from commercial to residential taxpayers. Participants in the neighborhood meeting included, for example: *Aaron Goode of the New Haven Bioregional Group *Philip Langdon of New Urban News *Peter Stein of the Regional Growth Partnership *Betty Thompson and Justin Elicker of
Friends of East Rock Park *members of New
Haven's citizen budget review panel (Allan Brison, David Cameron, and Alex Marathas) While certainly no panacea, regionalism does hold promise. The concept applies as much to Connecticut's
relationship to neighboring states as it does to sections of our own state.
10:47 pm edt
Wednesday, March 18, 2009
Regional Approaches to Savings and Smart GrowthIn news related to the posts of March 10 and February
10 below. . .
Hamden State Rep. Brendan Sharkey of the Smart Growth Working Group is expected to speak briefly at the Monday, March 23 meeting of New Haven’s East Rock neighborhood Community Management
Team at 7 p.m. at East Rock School on Nash Street. Related articles appear here and –- with particularly direct implications for New Haven taxpayers and advocates of payments-in-lieu-of-taxes (PILOT)
-- here. More, from Smart Growth Online . . . A May 27, 2008 post -- archived here -- discussed related issues.
. . . . . The
February 10 post below mentioned “the federal Land and Water Conservation Fund, which has been chronically exploited in recent years, with dollars diverted from their intended purpose: matching funds
that states and localities commit to conservation.” Now, two recent Times articles: March 14, 2009 Editorial: Promised Land “Federal dollars
promised to complete long-pending acquisitions of threatened lands across the country should not be diverted.”
March 12, 2009 New Budget Reflects Shift Toward Conservation By NOELLE STRAUB, Greenwire “Beyond the increased funds for many
Interior Department agencies, the budget proposal as President Obama has outlined focuses on acquiring more public land, addressing
climate change issues and raising fees on the oil and gas industry.” Also, Yale Law alum Van Jones, founder of Green for All, will be the Obama administration’s “special adviser for green jobs, enterprise and
innovation.” The New Yorker profiled him in January 2009.
10:03 pm edt
More on Guns and Gun Violence Since the February 25 post below, a few more items
related to guns and gun violence: *The
effort in Connecticut to explore "microstamping" as a means of identifying shooters and traffickers. *The cost in lives, including in New Haven, where most recently Thomas Daniels and Maurice Nicholson
were killed. *News of Illinois
pastor Fred Winters, shot in his church in a brazen attack. *Southwestern
Germany’s horror: having a troubled teen commit mass murder using one of his family’s 16 legally held firearms. *A similar killing spree in Alabama, and controversy in D.C., are mentioned in this
New York Times editorial: March
13, 2009 Editorial: Now Alabama “The latest rampage in Alabama is yet another bloody
example of why Congress should pass the national assault weapons ban.”
12:58 am edt
Friday, March 13, 2009
Six Overtimes, True Midnight MadnessThe January 26 post below combined UConn basketball with other commentary. With some regret because UConn lost, I confess now to having watched to the end of the extraordinary
Big East basketball game just completed in which Syracuse defeated the Huskies in six overtimes! For the Huskies it
is now on to the NCAA tournament next week. Fans can hope that
this UConn team does not resemble the arguably more talented, deeper 2005-06 team that was upset by George Mason and generally
underachieved in the tournament, winning only narrowly in earlier games that tournament and easing up on its relentless shot-blocking
in its final contests. This year's team includes two players from that squad as well as several more who endured
the 2006-07 and 2007-08 seasons, the latter of which ended prematurely due to point guard A.J. Price's severe injury in
last year's first round. This year's team also is trying to cope with a key player's absence, in this case
Jerome Dyson. Ever the optimist, I almost perennially pick UConn
to win the tournament -- and twice, in 1999 and 2004, my bracket has actually been right. Let's hope that again
a five-year interval will prove favorable. I'm going with the Huskies notwithstanding the doubts.
Time for a few hours of sleep. . .
1:44 am edt
Tuesday, March 10, 2009
Economic and Environmental Concerns in Connecticut
10:40 pm edt
|